ReviewClinics in shoulder and elbow2026
The use of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review of the literature.
Review in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLateral epicondylitis (LE) is a degenerative overuse angio-fibroblastic dysplasia caused by eccentric overload at the origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for managing LE.
methodsThis systematic review was registered with PROSPERO under the ID CRD420251165456. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the NHS Knowledge and Library Hub and PubMed. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, including fair-to-good-quality case series and four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias. Risk of bias was assessed using validated tools appropriate to each study design, and results were synthesized using various statistical methods.
resultsThree hundred and eleven elbows were treated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation. The majority have improved pain following these procedures, and no serious adverse events were reported. Overall, the evidence suggests that RF is a viable minimally invasive alternative for chronic LE, yielding significant pain relief and functional improvement with quick recovery and low risk. In comparative trials, its outcomes are on par with those of open or arthroscopic surgery, while offering shorter operative time and potentially a quicker return to work/activities.
conclusionsRF represents a reasonable surgical alternative for patients who fail conservative therapy, particularly those seeking rapid recovery. However, claims of definitive superiority over other surgical techniques are not supported by available evidence. Future research should include sham-controlled or active-comparator RCTs with standardized outcome measures and long-term follow-up (≥2 years).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.