ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Reduced Motor Preparation and Altered EEG Signatures of Prediction in Autistic Adults.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced Motor Preparation and Altered EEG Signatures of Prediction in Autistic Adults.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Reduced flexibility in predictive tuning and contextual adaptation in autism: an EEG and behavioral study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A standing hypothesis proposes that the social and behavioral diagnostic features of autism may develop as a result of more fundamental difficulties in forming and utilizing predictions. More specifically, in the present study, we hypothesized that autistic individuals are less likely to mobilize motor preparatory processes when given reason to anticipate an imperative cue. In a preregistered experiment, we asked participants to respond as quickly as possible to target sounds embedded in a regular periodic sequence of tones, and informed them that the three distinct auditory tones in the sequence signal different probabilities of a target on the next beat. We found that a group of autistic participants showed significantly less benefit of cues signaling high target probability on target response time than an IQ- and language-matched control group of non-autistic participants. In concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, the autistic group also showed a reduced effect of high probability cues on the late CNV, a motor preparatory ramping potential. Group differences in anticipatory desynchronization of motor-related mu and beta oscillations were less straightforward-rather than showing broadly weaker predictive desynchronization, the autistic group showed reduced desynchronization specifically following medium probability cues. We also found evidence of a group difference in neural entrainment to the 1 Hz periodic sequence: the autistic group showed shallower ramping potentials anticipating the next event across all cue types, and reduced phase entrainment at posterior electrodes. Our results focus attention on reduced spontaneous predictive motor preparation as a possible sensorimotor contribution to autism's more visible manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.