ArticleAnimal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho
Effects of the Switch From a Short-Day Photoperiod With Natural Light to a Long-Day Photoperiod With White Light-Emitting Diode or Induction Lighting on Milk Production and Endocrine Profiles in Lactating Dairy Cows.
Article in Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the response of milk production and endocrine profile to a switch from short-day photoperiod (SDPP) with natural light to long-day photoperiod (LDPP) with white light-emitting diode (WLED) or induction lighting (IL) in lactating dairy cows. Nine Holstein cows (198 ± 10.0 days in milk) were initially exposed to SDPP of 10:14 h light-dark cycle (10L:14D) with natural light (SDPP period), followed by a long-day photoperiod (LDPP; 16L:8D) using either WLED (443 nm peak, LDPP-W, n = 5) or IL (IL; 529 nm peak, LDPP-I, n = 4). Each period comprised a 1-week adaptation and a 2-week sampling period. Milk yield decreased after switching to LDPP-W (p < 0.05) but remained unchanged with LDPP-I. The slope of milk yield over the entire trial period (from the beginning of SDPP to the end of LDPP period) differed depending on lighting type (p = 0.05), being negative in the LDPP-W and positive in the LDPP-I. Plasma prolactin concentration in the light period increased after switching to LDPP-I but not to LDPP-W. These results indicate that LDPP using IL is likely more effective in promoting milk yield than WLED, potentially due to enhanced prolactin secretion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.