ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy
Does More Mean Better? Treatment Intensity and Predictors of Clinically Significant Change in Suicidal Ideation During Dialectical Behaviour Therapy.
Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined whether DBT treatment intensity predicts clinically significant change (CSC) in suicidal ideation, whether maladaptive personality traits moderate this relationship and whether early symptom improvements in suicidal ideation from baseline to midtreatment predicted CSC at post-treatment, above and beyond the effects of treatment intensity and personality traits. Adults (n = 105) in a hospital-based DBT day treatment programme were triaged into three DBT intensity tracks over 12 weeks: low intensity (weekly DBT skills group), mid intensity (weekly skills group plus individual therapy) and high intensity (two weekly skills groups, individual therapy). Suicidal ideation was assessed using the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI), and maladaptive personality traits were assessed using the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 at baseline, Week 6 and Week 12. Early symptom improvement was operationalized as change in BSSI scores from baseline to Week 6. CSC at Week 12 was defined as a reliable improvement from baseline to Week 12 and a BSSI score of ≤ 6 at Week 12. Suicidal ideation decreased significantly over time, with no differences across treatment intensity levels or maladaptive personality traits. Early symptom improvement predicted higher odds of achieving CSC at Week 12, whereas Disinhibition predicted lower odds of achieving CSC. Suicidal ideation improved across DBT intensity levels, with early reductions in suicidal ideation and Disinhibition, but not treatment intensity, emerging as key predictors of clinically significant recovery at post-treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.