Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723248›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

'It Got Me Thinking About My Home Environment but Was Also Great Fun': Using Experiential Methods in Public Involvement Workshops on Indoor Air Pollution in Later Life.

Jennifer Liddle, Gemma F Spiers, Angela Wearn, Katie H Thomson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer LiddlePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1059-1230
Gemma F SpiersPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2121-4529
Angela WearnPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-6087
Katie H ThomsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9614-728X

Funding

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle UniversityNational Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria NIHR200173National Institute for Health and Care Research School for Social Care Research NIHR-SSCR-CDA15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic involvement in health research is increasingly recognised as essential, yet involving older people, particularly care home residents, remains challenging. Creative and arts-based methods have been proposed as a means of improving accessibility and engagement, but tend to be selected for their perceived general appeal rather than their connection to the research topic. This paper describes an experiential public involvement approach in which activities were deliberately chosen to connect with and embody the sub-topics of the research.

methodsThree workshops were held with a group of older people, including care home residents, to inform a research agenda on indoor air pollution. Each workshop employed a hands-on experiential activity (painting ceramics, attending a glass-blowing demonstration, and building terrariums); all were aligned with the topic of indoor air quality. Workshops were designed to be informal, enjoyable and accessible, deliberately departing from traditional academic formats.

resultsTen older people participated, including three care home residents. Workshops generated research priorities and identified important outcomes, including quality of life and dizziness, and acceptable interventions relating to indoor air pollution. Feedback indicated high levels of enjoyment, learning and appetite for continued involvement. The experiential approach was well received, fostering relaxed and meaningful discussion, equal participation between care home residents and community-dwelling older adults, and engagement that extended beyond the research itself.

conclusionsExperiential methods, purposefully aligned with research content, offer a distinctive and effective approach to public involvement with older people, including care home residents. This approach extends existing creative and arts-based methods by embedding a clear conceptual connection to the research topic within activity design, with broader implications for inclusive public involvement practice. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The workshops described in this paper were themselves the public involvement activity. Older people, including care home residents, actively shaped the research agenda on indoor air pollution by identifying priority outcomes and acceptable interventions. As this was an initial exploration into a new topic area, the research team had no established public contributor contacts with relevant lived experience of or interest in indoor air pollution to involve in co-designing the workshops. The workshops themselves were therefore the first step in building those relationships, with the intention that members of the group will be involved as genuine partners in any future research. Public contributors have been kept informed of the progress of this work throughout, including during preparation of this manuscript, and it is intended that members of the group will be involved in the development of future funding proposals as co-applicants.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorCommunity ParticipationHome EnvironmentAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleNursing Home ResidentsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID42723248
PMCPMC13562808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.