ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Tri-Functional Electrocatalysis for Zinc-Air Battery Coupled Water Splitting: A Catalyst-Electrode-Device-System Perspective.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tri‑functional electrocatalysis is crucial for coupling rechargeable zinc‑air batteries with water splitting (WS), enabling self‑powered hydrogen production and versatile energy conversion. Although numerous catalysts demonstrate excellent half-cell activities toward the hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, and oxygen reduction reaction, their practical application in battery-driven water electrolysis remains challenging. The major bottleneck is multiscale mismatch, which involves conflicting adsorption energetics at atomic sites, unstable gas‑liquid‑solid interfaces at electrodes, device degradation under alternating charge‑discharge and electrolysis modes, and voltage‑power imbalances at the system level. This review goes beyond conventional material summaries by constructing a catalyst-electrode-device-system framework to systematically examine how electronic modulation, defect engineering, heterostructure design, single-atom site tuning, and self-supported electrode construction influence intrinsic activity, mass transport, interfacial durability, and overall cell performance. Importantly, the actual operating point of the coupled system is determined by the intersection of the battery discharge curve and the electrolyzer polarization curve, rather than by isolated half‑cell metrics alone. Finally, we highlight future opportunities including operando characterization techniques, AI‑driven catalyst screening, standardized device evaluation protocols, and system-level co‑design for practical renewable energy devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.