Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723203›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Tri-Functional Electrocatalysis for Zinc-Air Battery Coupled Water Splitting: A Catalyst-Electrode-Device-System Perspective.

Xixi Di, Chao Duan, Shuzhen Li, Yiyang Che, Xiaoshuang Liu, Chuanyin Xiong, Mengxia Shen, Yichao Wang, Derek Hao, Yonghao Ni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xixi DiCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Chao DuanCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-8107
Shuzhen LiCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Yiyang CheCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Xiaoshuang LiuCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Chuanyin XiongCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-3492
Mengxia ShenCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Yichao WangSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6295-6492
Derek HaoSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9981-7499
Yonghao NiLimerick Pulp and Paper Centre and Department of Chemical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6107-6672

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 22178206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tri‑functional electrocatalysis is crucial for coupling rechargeable zinc‑air batteries with water splitting (WS), enabling self‑powered hydrogen production and versatile energy conversion. Although numerous catalysts demonstrate excellent half-cell activities toward the hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, and oxygen reduction reaction, their practical application in battery-driven water electrolysis remains challenging. The major bottleneck is multiscale mismatch, which involves conflicting adsorption energetics at atomic sites, unstable gas‑liquid‑solid interfaces at electrodes, device degradation under alternating charge‑discharge and electrolysis modes, and voltage‑power imbalances at the system level. This review goes beyond conventional material summaries by constructing a catalyst-electrode-device-system framework to systematically examine how electronic modulation, defect engineering, heterostructure design, single-atom site tuning, and self-supported electrode construction influence intrinsic activity, mass transport, interfacial durability, and overall cell performance. Importantly, the actual operating point of the coupled system is determined by the intersection of the battery discharge curve and the electrolyzer polarization curve, rather than by isolated half‑cell metrics alone. Finally, we highlight future opportunities including operando characterization techniques, AI‑driven catalyst screening, standardized device evaluation protocols, and system-level co‑design for practical renewable energy devices.

Indexed as

self‐powered systemstri‐functional electrocatalystswater splittingzinc–air batteries

Identifiers

PMID42723203
PMCPMC13562782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.