Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723088›Full record

ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2026

Effect of Order of Testing on Intraocular Pressure and Tear Production Measurement in Dogs.

Kate Rowatt Keenen, Daniel Keenen, Elizabeth Adkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kate Rowatt KeenenHope Advanced Ophthalmology, Vienna, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-4811
Daniel KeenenData Analysis Consultant, Sterling, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5168-8042
Elizabeth AdkinsHope Advanced Ophthalmology, Vienna, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if the order of performing Schirmer tear test -1 (STT-1) and intraocular pressure (IOP) using a rebound tonometer influences the diagnostic values in a general population of dogs. ANIMALS STUDIED: 122 eyes from 61 dogs of a variety of signalments and presentations. PROCEDURES: Dogs were randomly assigned into IOP first (Group A) and STT-1 first (Group B) groups. Each group had an STT-1 test, IOP measured by rebound tonometry, fluorescein staining, and a complete ocular examination.

resultsNo significant differences were found between Group A and Group B for either tear production (p = 0.62) or IOP (p = 0.27). There were no significant differences with gender for both groups, and no significant difference was found between left and right eyes for IOP when left eyes were measured first.

conclusionsThe order of performing STT-1 and rebound tonometry has no significant effect on tear production or IOP for a general population of dogs. The order of testing is unlikely to have a clinically significant effect.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureTearsTonometry, OcularAnimalsDogsFemaleMalecaninediagnostic testingglaucomaKCSrebound tonometrySchirmer tear test 1

Identifiers

PMID42723088
PMCPMC13562757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.