ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026
Linking microbial community composition of three rootstock genotypes to apple replant disease susceptibility.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApple replant disease (ARD) is a worldwide issue of complex biotic origin. The exact aetiology has yet to be fully elucidated and environmentally friendly and economically feasible countermeasures are sparse. The breeding of tolerant apple rootstock genotypes shows some promise as reduced sensitivity on selected ARD-affected soils has been shown for some rootstock genotypes. By adding insights into the root-associated microbiome, we aimed to complement previously published results, examining the response in growth, gene expression and production of phenolic compounds in roots of seven Malus genotypes in ARD soil. We selected the two least susceptible rootstock genotypes of the previous study, EMR.2 and G.935, in addition to the susceptible rootstock genotype M.26. The objective of this study was to gain insights into the bacterial community composition of the rhizosphere and root endosphere of less susceptible rootstock genotypes in comparison to the susceptible one.
resultsIn an Illumina-based sequencing approach, the composition of rhizosphere as well as endophytic bacterial communities was investigated for apple plants in ARD soil and disinfected ARD soil. ARD impacted the rhizosphere stronger than the endosphere, where rootstock genotype influence was stronger. G.935 generally showed a more distinct and diverse microbiome than the other two rootstock genotypes. In bacterial communities, the relative abundance of Pseudomonadota decreased in ARD samples, while Actinomycetota increased. In the endosphere, this was mostly accounted for by Streptomyces. A qPCR approach confirmed the high abundance of Streptomyces. Interestingly, another qPCR approach did not indicate a high abundance of plant pathogenic Streptomyces in the same samples.
conclusionsARD strongly influenced the bacterial microbiome in the rhizosphere and, to a lesser extent, the root endophytic microbiome. The distinct and more diverse bacterial microbiome of G.935 might help against biotic stress, such as ARD. However, EMR.2 was previously found to be less susceptible to ARD, too, suggesting additional factors must play a role and additional research is necessary. Pathogenicity of Streptomyces could not be proven but repeatedly high abundance of root endophytic Streptomyces under ARD conditions indicate an important role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.