Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723083›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026

Epigenetic regulation of neutrophil dysfunction in sepsis: mechanisms, biomarkers, and translational challenges.

Zhehan Zheng, Rui Tian, Yang Chen, Yinjiaozhi Li, Hongping Qu, Tingting Pan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhehan Zheng *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Rui Tian *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Yinjiaozhi LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Hongping QuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. hongpingqu0412@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6839-1384
Tingting PanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. ptt12080@rjh.com.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82241033National Natural Science Foundation of China 82402510National Natural Science Foundation of China 82572475Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality 24ZR1447500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection and remains a major challenge in critical care medicine. Neutrophils are central components of innate immunity, but their functions are markedly altered during sepsis. These alterations include disturbed granulopoiesis, prolonged survival, impaired migration, dysregulated inflammatory responses, imbalanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and excessive formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Epigenetic regulation may help explain how neutrophils acquire distinct functional states during infection and inflammation. However, current evidence comes from diverse clinical and experimental settings, and the contribution of epigenetic changes to neutrophil dysfunction in sepsis should be interpreted in relation to disease stage, tissue context, and model system. MAIN BODY: This review summarizes current evidence on the epigenetic regulation of neutrophil dysfunction in sepsis, with emphasis on DNA methylation, histone modifications, non-coding RNAs, and RNA modifications. We first outline key features of septic neutrophils, including abnormal development and lifespan, inflammatory dysregulation, impaired chemotaxis, ROS imbalance, and NETs formation. We then discuss how epigenetic mechanisms are involved in these processes by influencing chromatin accessibility, transcriptional activity, inflammatory responsiveness, and neutrophil fate. Particular attention is given to the context-dependent effects of epigenetic regulation. In some settings, these changes may support antimicrobial defense, whereas in others they may contribute to endothelial injury, immunothrombosis, tissue damage, and organ dysfunction. We also consider the differences between evidence from human sepsis studies, animal models, isolated-cell experiments, and non-sepsis inflammatory conditions. Finally, we discuss the possible translational implications of these findings for biomarker development and therapeutic exploration, with attention to validation, patient selection, timing of intervention, and the balance between limiting inflammatory injury and preserving antimicrobial defense.

conclusionEpigenetic regulation provides a useful perspective for understanding the plasticity and dysfunction of neutrophils in sepsis. Future studies combining longitudinal clinical cohorts, single-cell and spatial multi-omics, and functional validation are needed to clarify which epigenetic changes are clinically relevant and whether they can be translated into reliable biomarkers or targeted therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEpigenesis, GeneticNeutrophilsSepsisTranslational Research, BiomedicalTranslational Science, BiomedicalAnimalsExtracellular TrapsHumansBiomarkersBiomarkersEpigenetic regulationNeutrophil extracellular trapsNeutrophilsSepsisTranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID42723083
PMCPMC13563898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.