ArticleBMC nursing2026
Dyadic associations between patient self-efficacy, caregiver preparedness and self-care outcomes after stroke: a cross-sectional actor-partner interdependence model study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSelf-care after stroke develops within an interdependent patient-caregiver context. Although patient self-efficacy and caregiver preparedness are recognised as key determinants of post-stroke management, their dyadic associations with self-care-related variables remain insufficiently understood.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 198 patient-caregiver dyads recruited from three tertiary hospitals in China. Patient self-efficacy, caregiver preparedness, patient self-care ability and caregiver contribution were assessed using validated instruments. Dyadic associations were analysed using the actor-partner interdependence model within a distinguishable dyad regression framework. Standardised regression coefficients are reported.
resultsSignificant actor effects were identified for both members of the dyad. Patient self-efficacy was negatively associated with patient self-care ability (β= -0.242, p < 0.001), whereas caregiver preparedness was positively associated with caregiver contribution (β = 0.289, p < 0.001). No significant partner effects were observed. Patient self-efficacy and caregiver preparedness were positively correlated (r = 0.210, p < 0.01). The model explained 19.4% of the variance in patient self-care ability and 29.3% in caregiver contribution.
conclusionsIn this sample, self-care ability and caregiver contribution were associated with individuals' own psychological resources rather than cross-partner influences. Given the cross-sectional design and the absence of objective functional status measures, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. Intervention strategies should address patients and caregivers separately but concurrently, while recognising their distinct roles in self-care processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.