Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723048›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Association between ScholarRx Qmax question bank engagement and NBME CBSE and USMLE Step 1 performance.

Emma C Sherman, Jack I Stomberger, Kirsten A Porter-Stransky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma C ShermanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 607 Grove Rd, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7743-5330
Jack I StombergerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 607 Grove Rd, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA.
Kirsten A Porter-StranskyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 607 Grove Rd, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA. kp111@greenvillemed.sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9895-8641

Funding

ScholarRx MERICUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville SOARinG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the pass rate of the USMLE Step 1 exam has declined. Failing or delaying Step 1 can cost students time, money, and morale. Undergraduate medical curricula are increasingly supplemented with third-party resources to support successful completion of the curriculum and board exams. Empirical research on the utility of specific third-party resources for student success is needed to inform evidence-based resources and strategies to support students' success on standardized exams. To contribute to filling this gap, the present study examined the relationship between usage of specific components of the third-party resource ScholarRx and student performance on the Comprehensive Basic Science Exam (CBSE) and passing the USMLE Step 1 exam before clerkships began.

methodsTwo cohorts of students from a public medical school in the United States were included in the study: one from a Traditional discipline-based curriculum (n = 97) and one from an Integrated Organ System-based (IOS) curriculum (n = 103). ScholarRx data including usage of bricks, practice Qmax questions, flash facts, and express videos; biomedical science course averages; CBSE scores; and Step 1 outcomes were matched, de-identified, and analyzed (Traditional curriculum n = 97; Integrated Organ System curriculum n = 103). Multiple linear regression was performed to assess associations between engagement with specific ScholarRx tools and CBSE performance. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate statistical predictors of taking and passing Step 1 on time.

resultsMultiple linear regression revealed that student use of ScholarRx practice questions (Qmax; Unstandardized B = 0.004-0.005) and biomedical science grades (Unstandardized B = 1.414-1.610) were significantly, positively associated with CBSE scores (R

conclusionThis study found that students' voluntary use of ScholarRx practice questions was associated with higher performance on the CBSE and taking and passing the Step 1 exam on schedule in both a Traditional curriculum and an IOS curriculum.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateCurriculumHumansStudents, MedicalUnited StatesAcademic supportAssessmentCBSEExternal resourcesMedical educationPractice questionsScholarRxStep 1Third-party resources

Identifiers

PMID42723048
PMCPMC13560434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.