ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
A framework for extraction of clinical information from radiological mammography reports using large language models and retrieval augmented generation.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtracting structured information from free-text radiology reports is essential for downstream clinical analysis and decision support. In mammography, this challenge is amplified by heterogeneous writing styles, the absence of standardized terminology across institutions, and limited availability of annotated Spanish datasets. Large language models (LLMs) offer a compelling alternative by enabling few-shot generalization without task-specific fine-tuning.
methodsWe propose a structured Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework that leverages annotated mammography reports as in-context demonstrations, enabling joint named entity and relation extraction without task-specific fine-tuning. The framework is evaluated on Spanish BI-RADS-style mammography reports and achieves performance comparable to fine-tuned BETO models in low-resource settings, while significantly reducing training and deployment overhead.
resultsIn NER, GPT-based few-shot models achieved competitive performance (0.89-0.94 F[Formula: see text]) relative to the fine-tuned BETO baseline (0.97 F[Formula: see text]), despite requiring no task-specific training. In RE, LLMs showed moderate performance (up to 0.78 F[Formula: see text]), remaining below the supervised BETO model (0.99 F[Formula: see text]), reflecting the greater sensitivity of RE to boundary errors and cross-sentence context. Inference costs were low (fractions of a cent per report) and latency remained within seconds, enabling practical deployment scenarios. Local open-weight models preserved privacy and runtime efficiency but exhibited substantially lower accuracy.
conclusionFew-shot RAG combined with modern LLMs provides a viable, data-efficient alternative for structuring Spanish mammography reports, particularly in low-resource or rapid-deployment settings. While fine-tuned encoders remain preferable for high-accuracy RE, the proposed framework offers a practical balance between performance, operational cost, and accessibility. A remaining limitation is the need for an initial annotated subset to populate the RAG store; future work will explore weak supervision, multimodal extensions, and cross-site generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.