ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Barriers and facilitators to advance care planning implementation: a qualitative interprofessional study in the Spanish public health and social care system.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvance Care Planning (ACP) is essential for improving the quality of end-of-life care. Despite having a well-established legal framework, the implementation of ACP in Spain is limited and largely bureaucratic. The existing literature has primarily focused on knowledge deficits among professionals, overlooking the emotional, cultural, and organisational dynamics shaping clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the experiences of healthcare and non-healthcare professionals regarding ACP implementation and to identify the multilevel factors that influence its integration into routine practice within the public health and social care system.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study was conducted within the Public Health System of Asturias (Spain). A multidisciplinary focus group was carried out with 10 professionals (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and auxiliary nursing care technicians [TCAE; equivalent to healthcare assistants]) selected through purposive sampling. Data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. To support credibility, nine participants took part in an immediate participatory review at the end of the focus group, in which they reviewed a preliminary synthesis based on the observers' field notes and collaboratively reorganised it into a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) matrix. The study adhered to COREQ guidelines.
resultsTwo main themes emerged: barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation. Barriers were identified at professional (emotional avoidance, limited communication training), sociocultural (family conspiracy of silence, paternalism), and organisational levels (bureaucratisation, fragmented care, rigidity of the Advance Directive document). Key facilitators included longitudinal care in primary care settings, the strategic role of nursing in initiating and sustaining ACP conversations, and increasing patient empowerment. Participants highlighted the need to move beyond advance directives as isolated documents towards integrating ACP as a dynamic, ongoing process within the electronic health record.
conclusionsACP implementation is hindered by a perceived dissonance between autonomy-oriented theoretical models and a clinical reality constrained by cultural inertia, emotional avoidance, and organisational fragmentation. Overcoming these barriers may require moving beyond technical training to incorporate emotional and communicative competencies and shifting from a document-centred approach to a relational and dynamic model of care, with primary care and nursing as key drivers. These findings contribute to qualitative ACP research by conceptualising ACP as a "living" process integrated into the electronic health record and by using participatory SWOT analysis to translate findings into implementation-relevant insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.