Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723027›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Assessing interpersonal violence involvement in psychiatric patients: exploratory findings on the Interpersonal Violence Questionnaire (IVIQ).

Paula Kittelmann, Claudia Helmert, Nicolai Hojka, Jana Karp, Melanie Pouwels, Anita Scheuermann, Jakob Steglich, Silvia Krumm, Georg Schomerus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paula KittelmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. paula.kittelmann@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6777-7488
Claudia HelmertDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nicolai HojkaVorurteilsfrei e.V., Leipzig, Germany.
Jana KarpVorurteilsfrei e.V., Leipzig, Germany.
Melanie PouwelsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Anita ScheuermannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Jakob SteglichDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Silvia KrummDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Georg SchomerusDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the high rates of both violence victimization and perpetration in people experiencing mental illness, standardized screening tools in research and for routine psychiatric assessment are lacking, underscoring the need for feasible, standardized assessment approaches.

methodsA sample of adult psychiatric in- and out-patients at six German hospitals was surveyed, using the Interpersonal Violence Questionnaire (IVIQ), a 26-item self-report checklist assessing experiences of physical violence, sexual violence, and threats, both as victimization and perpetration, across the past 12 months and lifetime. Exploratory analyses included prevalence estimates, scoring characteristics, floor effects, inter-item associations, temporal stability, and associations with social desirability.

resultsIn 479 patients, lifetime sexual victimization and 12-month violence threat, as well as being pushed, were most frequent. IVIQ sum scores showed strong floor effects. Reports of victimization and perpetration frequently co-occurred; descriptive inter-item correlations were low to moderate. Temporal consistency varied across items, with lower stability for low-prevalence behaviors. Higher social desirability predicted lower 12-month perpetration reporting.

conclusionsThe IVIQ may provide a feasible, structured self-report approach for routine assessment of interpersonal violence involvement in psychiatric populations. Different scoring approaches may support descriptive assessment of cumulative burden and distinct forms of interpersonal violence involvement. Future versions should broaden the assessment of psychological violence. Associations between social desirability and reporting underline the importance of sensitive implementation, trauma-informed assessment practices, and cautious interpretation of self-reported violence experiences.

trial registrationThis study is registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) under registration number DRKS00032041 (Date of registration: 20th of July 2023).

Indexed as

Crime VictimsInterpersonal RelationsMental DisordersViolenceAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSex OffensesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultMental health service usersPerpetrationPsychiatric assessmentSelf-reportSevere mental illnessTrauma-informed careVictimizationViolence

Identifiers

PMID42723027
PMCPMC13563774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.