ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Virtual reality versus companion-delivered therapeutic touch for reducing pain and anxiety during suturing: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWound suturing is a common procedure in emergency departments and can cause considerable pain and anxiety. Non-pharmacological approaches, such as virtual reality (VR) and therapeutic touch, may help improve patients' comfort during the procedure.
objectiveThis randomized controlled trial compared the effects of VR and companion-delivered therapeutic touch on pain and anxiety during emergency suturing.
methodsThe trial was conducted in the emergency department of Shahid Bahonar Hospital in Kerman, Iran, between 2025 and 2026. In total, 87 patients were allocated to three groups: VR (n = 30), therapeutic touch (n = 27), and standard care (n = 30). Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and state anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State scale (STAI-State) immediately before and after suturing. The data were analyzed using statistical methods that adjusted for baseline differences between the groups.
resultsThe groups differed significantly in age and baseline anxiety. After adjustment for baseline values and age, both the VR and therapeutic touch groups had significantly lower post-procedure pain scores than the standard-care group (P < 0.001), whereas the difference between the VR and therapeutic touch groups was not statistically significant. For state anxiety, both intervention groups had significantly lower adjusted post-procedure scores than the standard-care group, and the VR group had significantly lower anxiety scores than the therapeutic touch group (P < 0.001).
conclusionBoth VR and therapeutic touch were associated with lower pain and anxiety during emergency suturing than standard care. VR appeared to provide an additional advantage over therapeutic touch for reducing anxiety, but not pain. These non-pharmacological interventions may offer practical options for improving patients' comfort during stressful emergency procedures. CLINICAL TRAIL: The trial was prospectively registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20260627069963N1) on July 3, 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.