ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Artificial intelligence applications in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an analysis of emerging research trends.
Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major public health challenge despite advances in emergency medical services (EMS) and resuscitation systems. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and artificial neural networks, is increasingly being investigated for applications spanning cardiac arrest recognition, rhythm analysis, prognostication, and clinical decision support. This study characterized the growth, geographic and institutional structure, collaboration patterns, influential sources, and emerging themes of the AI-OHCA literature.
methodsA bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection. The search identified 290 publications related to AI applications in OHCA, spanning 1996-2026. Publication and citation trends, countries, institutions, authors, journals, subject categories, and keyword co-occurrence were evaluated. VOSviewer was used to construct bibliometric networks, and Microsoft Excel was used for descriptive analyses and publication-trend visualization.
resultsA total of 290 publications were identified. Research output increased sharply beginning in 2019 and reached 53 publications (18.3% of the corpus) in 2025; 21 publications were indexed in 2026 at the time of data collection, representing an incomplete year. The United States (85 publications) and Spain (39) were the leading contributing countries, and the University of the Basque Country was the most productive institution (31 publications; 10.69%). Resuscitation was the most frequent publication source (40 publications; 13.79%), followed by Circulation (23) and Resuscitation Plus (16). Emergency Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, and Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems were the dominant WoS subject categories. Keyword mapping emphasized machine learning, survival, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiac arrest, and resuscitation, while author-level analyses demonstrated a concentrated, highly collaborative research network.
conclusionsResearch at the intersection of AI and OHCA has expanded rapidly since 2019 but remains concentrated within a relatively small number of countries, institutions, and collaborative research groups. The literature is primarily clinically oriented, with particular emphasis on recognition, resuscitation, survival prediction, and post-arrest outcomes. Future work should prioritize prospective and external validation, real-world EMS implementation, and evaluation across diverse patient populations and EMS systems. CLINICAL TRIAL #: Not applicable, this study is not a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.