SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Comparative effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on inflammatory biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized head-to-head trials.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInflammation contributes significantly to cardiovascular disease progression. While both atorvastatin and rosuvastatin have anti-inflammatory effects, evidence directly comparing their effects on inflammatory biomarkers is limited and inconsistent. This study aimed to compare their effects through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head RCTs comparing atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on inflammatory biomarkers. On August 14, 2024, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL, and subsequently searched ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished studies. We included RCTs directly comparing the two statins and reported changes in C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), or adiponectin. Using a random-effects model, we pooled the data and reported the results as mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024579712) (see the PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts checklist).
resultsA total of 35 RCTs (n = 6,148) were included. The pooled effect showed no significant difference in CRP reduction (MD: - 0.53 mg/L; 95% CI: - 1.10 to 0.05; p = 0.07; I
conclusionsRosuvastatin showed a modest but statistically significant advantage over atorvastatin in lowering CRP, especially in patients with higher baseline inflammation or hypertension. Evidence for other biomarkers remains inconclusive. Tailoring statin therapy to patient profiles may optimize benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.