ArticleBMC primary care2026
Challenges of the general practitioner's role in integrated primary health care: a qualitative study of trainees in a reform-oriented network in Northern Italy.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntegrated primary health care (PHC) is essential for efficient, equitable healthcare, especially amid rising chronic conditions and an aging population. It ensures coordinated care across services, with GPs as key gatekeepers. Yet, European systems face obstacles like service fragmentation, workforce shortages, inadequate funding, digital barriers, inconsistent policies and poor integration across services.
objectiveThis study explores the perspectives of trainee doctors in Northern Italy on the challenges of integrated PHC and suggests best practices to enhance integrated care and GP training.
methodsThis is a qualitative study using semi-structured remote interviews, analyzed using data-driven thematic analysis. Eligible participants were regional and university-based trainees.
resultsTwelve participants (7 F, 5 M, aged 25-49y, 8 regional and 4 university-based trainees) were recruited. All shared a good understanding of integrated PHC challenges, such as managing patients with chronic conditions and limitations of the digital infrastructure for interoperability across primary, secondary, community, and social care services. They noted that service fragmentation, increased patient access to online health information and remote consultations have shifted patient expectations and disrupted traditional primary care dynamics, making it more challenging for GPs to promote integrated care. Rural areas are facing shrinking local health services, lack of staff and reduced capacity to provide integrated care comparable to urban settings. Participants emphasized the importance of team-based care and the need for both bottom-up initiatives (e.g., self-initiated collaborations with local care providers) and top-down support mandated by policy, such as dedicated regular meetings during office hours and clinical governance initiatives. They shared examples of good practices that could be incorporated in future policies, such as on-call secondary care specialists available for phone consultation to prevent unnecessary referrals. Participants also highlighted the importance of quality standards in GP training and the need to develop competencies in effective team-based working.
conclusionsThis study highlights key challenges and actionable solutions proposed by GP trainees to improve integrated care and training, offering insights relevant to health systems beyond Italy. Although based on more engaged and reform-minded trainees, this calls for more research on this group of future primary care professionals, who may be key to informing interventions to improve integrated PHC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.