Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723006›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

Challenges of the general practitioner's role in integrated primary health care: a qualitative study of trainees in a reform-oriented network in Northern Italy.

L Marchesi, A F Azzolini, E Tobaldini, A Corraro, L M Bracchitta, B D'Avanzo, A Nobili, A De Simoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L MarchesiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Department of Excellence 2023- 2027, Policlinico, Milano, Italy. luca.marchesi@unimi.it.
A F AzzoliniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Department of Excellence 2023- 2027, Policlinico, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4291-0705
E TobaldiniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Department of Excellence 2023- 2027, Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
A CorraroDepartment of Health Policy, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
L M BracchittaDepartment of Health Policy, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
B D'AvanzoDepartment of Health Policy, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
A NobiliDepartment of Health Policy, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
A De SimoniWolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrated primary health care (PHC) is essential for efficient, equitable healthcare, especially amid rising chronic conditions and an aging population. It ensures coordinated care across services, with GPs as key gatekeepers. Yet, European systems face obstacles like service fragmentation, workforce shortages, inadequate funding, digital barriers, inconsistent policies and poor integration across services.

objectiveThis study explores the perspectives of trainee doctors in Northern Italy on the challenges of integrated PHC and suggests best practices to enhance integrated care and GP training.

methodsThis is a qualitative study using semi-structured remote interviews, analyzed using data-driven thematic analysis. Eligible participants were regional and university-based trainees.

resultsTwelve participants (7 F, 5 M, aged 25-49y, 8 regional and 4 university-based trainees) were recruited. All shared a good understanding of integrated PHC challenges, such as managing patients with chronic conditions and limitations of the digital infrastructure for interoperability across primary, secondary, community, and social care services. They noted that service fragmentation, increased patient access to online health information and remote consultations have shifted patient expectations and disrupted traditional primary care dynamics, making it more challenging for GPs to promote integrated care. Rural areas are facing shrinking local health services, lack of staff and reduced capacity to provide integrated care comparable to urban settings. Participants emphasized the importance of team-based care and the need for both bottom-up initiatives (e.g., self-initiated collaborations with local care providers) and top-down support mandated by policy, such as dedicated regular meetings during office hours and clinical governance initiatives. They shared examples of good practices that could be incorporated in future policies, such as on-call secondary care specialists available for phone consultation to prevent unnecessary referrals. Participants also highlighted the importance of quality standards in GP training and the need to develop competencies in effective team-based working.

conclusionsThis study highlights key challenges and actionable solutions proposed by GP trainees to improve integrated care and training, offering insights relevant to health systems beyond Italy. Although based on more engaged and reform-minded trainees, this calls for more research on this group of future primary care professionals, who may be key to informing interventions to improve integrated PHC.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedGeneral PractitionersPhysician's RolePrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth Care ReformHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchHealth Service FragmentationHealth system reformIntegrated CareInterprofessional CollaborationPrimary Health CareRural Areas

Identifiers

PMID42723006
PMCPMC13560449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.