Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42722970›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Dissociating the hierarchical processing of perceptual and food category information under different task demands.

Rui Zhang, Gelin Cui, Jinhong Ding

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rui ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Gelin CuiDepartment of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Jinhong DingDepartment of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China. dingjh@cnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3574-9508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To clarify whether food category selectivity in the ventral visual pathway arises from genuine category-specific processing or low-level perceptual differences-a core premise of the diagnostic feature encoding hypothesis-and how it is modulated by task demands, this study assigned participants to perform either a perceptual (color-matching) or categorical (food/nonfood) one-back task. Using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) and cross-task representational similarity analysis (RSA) of EEG data, we found that perceptual features dominated early processing (100-200 ms), whereas food category information emerged around 120 ms and gradually became dominant after 200 ms, with the categorical task selectively enhancing the strength of category information during late time windows. Searchlight analysis revealed a spatiotemporal dissociation between perceptual and categorical processing, consistent with hierarchical visual processing theories. For ERP correlates, high perceptual similarity amplified P3 amplitude and low perceptual similarity enhanced N2 amplitude in the perceptual task, with a parallel neural pattern observed under the categorical task. Cross-task comparisons further demonstrated a task-specific modulation pattern: The N2 conflict effect for perceptual similarity was exclusive to the perceptual task, while P3 amplitude was selectively boosted for task-relevant stimulus dimensions. These findings confirm that food category representations are independent and not merely secondary byproducts of low-level perceptual features, thus challenging a core premise of the diagnostic feature encoding hypothesis. This work further underscores the critical regulatory roles of visual attention and task goals in sculpting object representations within the ventral visual pathway.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsFoodPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCategory effectsMultivariate pattern analysisPerceptual featuresRepresentational similarity analysisTask goal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.