Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42722958›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Rewiring the Research Enterprise: Why Primary Care Is the Next Frontier.

Ryan M Kane, Jennifer G Jackman, Mary F Henningfield, Christina M Hester, Andrea L Cherrington, Katherine Sanchez, Hazel Tapp, Christoph P Hornik, Adrian F Hernandez, Rowena J Dolor and 1 more

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ryan M KaneDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer G JackmanDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Mary F HenningfieldDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Christina M HesterDARTNet Institute, Aurora, CO, USA.
Andrea L CherringtonDivision of General Internal Medicine and Population Science, Department of Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Katherine SanchezPatient and Community Engaged Research (PACER) Center, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA.
Hazel TappDepartment of Family Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Christoph P HornikDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Adrian F HernandezDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Rowena J DolorDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Russell L RothmanVanderbilt Institute for Population and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Russell.rothman@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1506-3990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care research remains underused for generating pragmatic, generalizable evidence to enhance patient care. Despite the prominent national focus on addressing chronic disease and the high volume of patients seen in primary care, primary care research remains critically underfunded. In April 2025, the Duke Clinical Research Institute convened a national "Think Tank" of cross-disciplinary experts to explore how to better integrate clinical research into primary care. Primary care holds promise to improve clinical research by offering rapid recruitment of diverse patients and engagement of potential participants by trusted "front-line" providers, by allowing enhanced pragmatic data collection methods, and by addressing critical disease-specific and population health questions. However, primary care research is challenged by workforce shortages, fragmented research infrastructure, funding uncertainty, and misaligned incentives. Three key approaches were identified to bolster the future of primary care research: (1) expanding practice-based research networks, (2) leveraging digital health technologies, and (3) investing in the future of primary care research through increased funding and training opportunities. Together, these approaches can advance patient-oriented, pragmatic research in primary care to create a healthier future for all.

Indexed as

clinical trialslearning healthcare systempractice-based research networksprimary careprimary care research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.