ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Automated Cortical Thickness Index Measurement in Pelvic Radiographs Using a Multi-Stage Deep Learning Framework.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Cortical Thickness Index (CTI) measured on hip radiographs is a practical indicator of femoral bone quality and may assist osteoporosis screening and preoperative orthopedic planning. However, manual CTI measurement is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. We developed and validated a multi-stage deep learning framework for automated CTI measurement on routine pelvic radiographs. In this retrospective study, 843 radiographs from a tertiary center were collected, of which 647 met the eligibility criteria for model development and internal testing. An external dataset of 55 radiographs was used for validation. The framework combined RetinaNet-based detection to localize the femur and key landmarks with U-Net-based segmentation to delineate cortical boundaries. To improve anatomical consistency across patients, the measurement level was standardized relative to femoral head diameter. On the internal test set of 129 radiographs, femur detection achieved 96.99% precision and 100% recall. Automated CTI values closely matched expert measurements (0.376 ± 0.087 vs 0.373 ± 0.097), with a mean difference of 0.003, a strong correlation (r = 0.941, p < 0.01), and excellent agreement (ICC = 0.935). Bland-Altman analysis showed narrow 95% limits of agreement (-0.062 to 0.068). Clinically, this pipeline not only reduces reliance on tedious manual measurements but dramatically enhances inter-evaluator reproducibility (ICC = 0.702). In the external cohort (n = 55), the end-to-end pipeline success rate was 83.41%. These findings support the technical feasibility of automated and standardized CTI measurement from pelvic radiographs. Its potential use in osteoporosis screening or preoperative assessment requires independent clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42722953What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.