Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42722825›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2026

Zebrafish relatives as models for functional comparative genetics and genomics.

Marco Podobnik, Yansong Lu, Uwe Irion, Peter D Currie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco PodobnikAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. marco.podobnik@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5480-7086
Yansong LuAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3093-8670
Uwe IrionMax Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. uwe.irion@tuebingen.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2823-5840
Peter D CurrieAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. peter.currie@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8874-8862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closely related species, such as danionin fishes of the Danio, Danionella and Devario genera, often differ in their biology despite their shared evolutionary history, providing a platform for defining the molecular basis for the divergence of phenotypic traits. Such an approach requires the availability of large-scale genomic data, which have been provided by recent reports detailing the genomes of several danionins. Facilitated by the large number of genetic tools that are available for manipulation of the most studied member of this subgroup - the zebrafish, Danio rerio - the danionins have emerged as a useful comparative model system. Here we review their phylogeny and outline the phenotypic traits that are distinct to individual species or genera. We highlight how functional genetic tools such as interspecies hybridization, mutagenesis and transgenesis, as well as the recently reported genome assemblies, have enabled new avenues for hypothesis-driven and technology-driven exploration that collectively establish danionins as important genetic models for understanding a wide range of evolutionary innovations.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.