ArticleNature neuroscience2026
Feature interference underlies a neuronal basis for the behavioral cost of task uncertainty.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential experience reshapes population representations in visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cognitive processes are disentangled at cortex-wide scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans and animals have an impressive ability to juggle multiple tasks in a constantly changing environment. This flexibility, however, worsens performance under uncertain task conditions. Here we combined monkey electrophysiology, human psychophysics and artificial neural network modeling to investigate the neuronal mechanisms underlying this performance cost. We developed a behavioral paradigm to measure and influence participants' decision-making and perception in two distinct perceptual tasks. Our data reveal that both humans and monkeys, unlike an artificial neural network trained for the same tasks, make less accurate perceptual decisions when the task is uncertain. By comparing this neural network trained to produce correct choices with another network trained to replicate the participants' choices, we hypothesize that the cost of task uncertainty comes from feature interference. Through behavioral, physiological and causal experiments, we show that, under uncertain conditions, feature interference causes errors by inducing stronger representations of irrelevant features and entangled neuronal representations of different features. Our results suggest that cognitive capacity limitations may stem from interference between neural representations of different stimuli, tasks or memories.
Identifiers
42722796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.