ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Threats to neonatologists' professional identity formation: ethical implications of condensing neonatal-perinatal fellowship.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) recently announced a plan to alter pediatric subspecialty fellowship training. Such changes pose meaningful ethical and psychosocial consequences on neonatologists' professional identity formation (PIF), including how they develop moral reasoning, experience and manage distress, and sustain themselves in practice. In the current state, the ABP's plan poses serious ethical risks, compromising not only the foundations of future neonatologists but also our mission to provide high-quality patient care. In this paper, we argue that it is an ethical imperative for Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) fellowship programs to nurture the evolving professional identities of learners who will guide future innovation and progress in the field, while providing education that supports ethical, family-centered, high-quality clinical care for the most vulnerable patients.
Identifiers
42722767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.