ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026
Effects of ResB supplementation on gut microbiome composition in elderly pneumonia: a randomized pilot trial.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationalePneumonia remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults, often exacerbated by immune dysregulation and prolonged hospitalization. The gut-lung axis is increasingly recognized as a modulator of respiratory immunity, yet the therapeutic potential of targeted probiotic interventions in elderly pneumonia patients remains underexplored.
objectivesTo characterize gut microbial compositional changes, temporal shifts, and microbial interaction network dynamics associated with ResB® Lung Support probiotic supplementation in elderly patients hospitalized with pneumonia in this exploratory, hypothesis-generating pilot trial.
methodsIn a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients aged ≥60 years admitted with Pneumonia received either resB® probiotic capsules or placebo for 14 days alongside standard care. Stool samples were collected at baseline, day 15, and day 30 (or discharge). Microbiome profiling was performed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Statistical analyses included linear mixed-effects Modeling, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and trajectory and network assessments.
resultsSixteen patients completed the study. The probiotic group exhibited increased abundance of several beneficial taxa, including Bifidobacterium longum (p = 0.08, FDR = 0.16) and Blautia_A_141781 (p = 0.05, FDR = 0.1), along with positive temporal shifts in Prevotella copri and CAG_83. Pathogenic genera such as Corynebacterium (p = 0.06, FDR = 0.3) and Streptococcus (p = 0.07, FDR = 0.3) declined in the treatment arm. Log-fold change analysis showed significant increases in CAG_83 (p = 0.02, FDR = 0.09) and P. copri (p = 0.027, FDR = 0.09), with an upward trend for B. longum (p = 0.09, FDR = 0.18). Microbiome trajectory analysis indicated temporal shifts in gut microbial composition in the treatment group, and network analysis demonstrated enhanced connectivity among commensal taxa with reduced pathogenic interactions.
conclusionsProbiotic supplementation with resB® Lung Support was associated with changes in gut microbiome composition in elderly pneumonia patients, including shifts in several commensal and potentially pathogenic taxa. Given the exploratory nature of this pilot trial, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. The results suggest that microbiome-targeted nutritional interventions may influence gut microbial dynamics during acute respiratory illness and warrant further investigation in larger, multicenter studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2022/04/041687 (URL: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NjY5MjI) .
Identifiers
42722760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.