Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42722724›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2026

Mechanistic questions in aqueous-organic chemistry.

Andrea Delledonne, Fabrice Gallou, Suzanne A Blum

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea DelledonneDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9529-5793
Fabrice GallouChemical & Analytical Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8996-6079
Suzanne A BlumDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. blums@uci.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding organic chemistry in water presents challenges distinct from those encountered in conventional organic solvents. Reaction media are usually heterogeneous and contain colloidal objects (micelles and emulsion droplets) and undissolved solids; however, the analytical tools commonly used to study organic reaction mechanisms are often not well suited to such systems or require substantial adaptation deviating from synthetic conditions. As a result, the development and optimization of reactions proceed as though emulsion droplets are a 'magic box', in which progress is identified through inefficient trial-and-error approaches. Here we highlight outstanding mechanistic questions in aqueous-organic chemistry. Through case studies in selectivity control, trial-and-error reaction optimization and surfactant-free systems, we identify key gaps in mechanistic understanding. Finally, using analytical case studies in small-angle X-ray scattering, NMR spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, cryo-transmission electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy, we analyse the scope and limitations of current analytical methods in these systems and discuss opportunities for advancing mechanistic insight.

Identifiers

PMID42722724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.