Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42722723›Full record

ArticleCancer gene therapy2026

Clinical translation of senescence-related pan-cancer multi-omics: tools for assessment and immunotherapy prediction.

Xin Gao, Xue-Jian Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin GaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. gaoxin@xiangya.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8736-1172
Xue-Jian ZhouIntensive Care Unit, Zhuzhou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Zhuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence (CS) exerts dual roles in tumorigenesis, yet its pan-cancer molecular characteristics and clinical value remain unclear, hindering its translation to oncology and personalized therapy. To address the lack of specific and universal tools for senescence assessment and immunotherapy response prediction, this study systematically analyzed 1259 CS-related genes from the CellAge database across 31 cancer types by integrating multi-omics data, including bulk RNA-seq, single-cell/spatial transcriptomics, and CRISPR screening. We developed a rank-based algorithm SenScoreR (publicly available at https://gxhub.shinyapps.io/SenScoreR/ ) for senescence quantification, validated with 10 independent datasets, and constructed a machine learning-based predictive model CS.Sig for immunotherapy response. Results showed that tumors had significantly lower Rank-based Senescence Score (RSS) than normal tissues across 31 cancers (average diagnostic AUC = 0.895), with low RSS linked to poor survival; high RSS correlated with reduced genomic instability, enriched CD8⁺ T/NK cell/macrophage infiltration, upregulated PD-L1 expression, and elevated immune cytolytic activity. CS.Sig demonstrated robust performance in predicting ICI response (AUC = 0.716 across 10 cohorts), outperforming 13 existing signatures, while CRISPR screening identified 17 senescence-related targets (e.g., CEP55, PPP1CC) whose knockout enhanced anti-tumor immunity. Our findings clarify CS's role in maintaining tumor genomic stability and shaping immune microenvironments, and the developed SenScoreR, CS.Sig, and identified targets bridge basic CS research with clinical oncology, providing a translational resource and hypothesis basis for future experimental and clinical validation.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.