ArticleCancer gene therapy2026
Clinical translation of senescence-related pan-cancer multi-omics: tools for assessment and immunotherapy prediction.
Article in Cancer gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular senescence (CS) exerts dual roles in tumorigenesis, yet its pan-cancer molecular characteristics and clinical value remain unclear, hindering its translation to oncology and personalized therapy. To address the lack of specific and universal tools for senescence assessment and immunotherapy response prediction, this study systematically analyzed 1259 CS-related genes from the CellAge database across 31 cancer types by integrating multi-omics data, including bulk RNA-seq, single-cell/spatial transcriptomics, and CRISPR screening. We developed a rank-based algorithm SenScoreR (publicly available at https://gxhub.shinyapps.io/SenScoreR/ ) for senescence quantification, validated with 10 independent datasets, and constructed a machine learning-based predictive model CS.Sig for immunotherapy response. Results showed that tumors had significantly lower Rank-based Senescence Score (RSS) than normal tissues across 31 cancers (average diagnostic AUC = 0.895), with low RSS linked to poor survival; high RSS correlated with reduced genomic instability, enriched CD8⁺ T/NK cell/macrophage infiltration, upregulated PD-L1 expression, and elevated immune cytolytic activity. CS.Sig demonstrated robust performance in predicting ICI response (AUC = 0.716 across 10 cohorts), outperforming 13 existing signatures, while CRISPR screening identified 17 senescence-related targets (e.g., CEP55, PPP1CC) whose knockout enhanced anti-tumor immunity. Our findings clarify CS's role in maintaining tumor genomic stability and shaping immune microenvironments, and the developed SenScoreR, CS.Sig, and identified targets bridge basic CS research with clinical oncology, providing a translational resource and hypothesis basis for future experimental and clinical validation.
Identifiers
42722723What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.