ArticleScientific reports2026
Geometric and quantum kernel methods for predicting skeletal muscle outcomes in experimental chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal-muscle dysfunction is an important extrapulmonary feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but advanced computational representations require conservative evaluation in small preclinical cohorts. We analysed a cigarette-smoke mouse model of experimental COPD comprising 213 animals with blood and bronchoalveolar-lavage biomarkers to predict tibialis anterior muscle weight, muscle quality, and force. We developed a kernel-geometric quantum hybrid method in which synthetic symmetric positive definite (SPD) references are mapped through a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, compressed using train-only random projection, normalised, and supplied to low-dimensional simulated quantum regression circuits. We benchmarked this approach against classical Ridge/kernel models, SPD relational representations, and quantum-kernel regression using identical condition-stratified repeated cross-validation folds. Results were endpoint-specific. Biomarker-only Ridge had the lowest RMSE for force, indicating that a compact linear model was sufficient for this endpoint in the present cohort. Synth_ROSE had the numerically lowest RMSE for muscle weight and muscle quality, but paired fold-level testing did not establish statistically significant superiority after Holm adjustment. These findings support leakage-controlled, endpoint-specific benchmarking of SPD and simulated quantum feature maps, not claims of clinical readiness, quantum hardware advantage, or definitive superiority over classical learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.