Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42722712›Full record

Articlenpj health systems2026

Explainable SHAP-space fall risk profiling from electronic health records for inpatient prevention planning.

Matthias Schulte-Althoff, Peter Krappen, Felix Bießmann, Sebastian Jäger, Rahel Gubser, Armin Hauss, Felix Balzer, Tim Kilgus, Daniel Fürstenau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthias Schulte-AlthoffDepartment of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, School of Business & Economics, Berlin, Germany.
Peter KrappenDepartment of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, School of Business & Economics, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BießmannBerlin University of Applied Sciences and Technology (BHT), Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian JägerBerlin University of Applied Sciences and Technology (BHT), Berlin, Germany.
Rahel GubserDepartment of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, School of Business & Economics, Berlin, Germany.
Armin HaussBusiness Division Nursing, Administrative Department for Academic Health Professions in Practice - Nursing Science and Quality Development, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BalzerInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tim KilgusDepartment of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, School of Business & Economics, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel FürstenauDepartment of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, School of Business & Economics, Berlin, Germany. daniel.fuerstenau@fu-berlin.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie 16SV8854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls in hospital settings are common and costly. They happen for many different reasons, which limits the effectiveness of one-size-fits-all prevention strategies. In a retrospective observational study using electronic health record data from a large German university hospital between 2016 and 2022, we trained an ensemble model to predict inpatient falls. We then derived patient-level SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and clustered model-detected fallers to identify recurrent SHAP-based risk profiles. The resulting centroids were applied to alerted patients in the held-out test set. The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.36 on the test set, outperforming a baseline model that used only guideline features. We benchmarked SHAP-space clustering against raw feature-space clustering techniques in this alerted test cohort, finding that SHAP-space K-means showed the largest separation in observed fall incidence. The nine clusters identified were then mapped to clinically interpretable risk profiles. These profiles link model alerts to guideline-consistent prevention domains. However, further external validation studies are needed before clinical deployment.

Identifiers

PMID42722712
PMCPMC13562730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.