Articlenpj health systems2026
Explainable SHAP-space fall risk profiling from electronic health records for inpatient prevention planning.
Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Falls in hospital settings are common and costly. They happen for many different reasons, which limits the effectiveness of one-size-fits-all prevention strategies. In a retrospective observational study using electronic health record data from a large German university hospital between 2016 and 2022, we trained an ensemble model to predict inpatient falls. We then derived patient-level SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and clustered model-detected fallers to identify recurrent SHAP-based risk profiles. The resulting centroids were applied to alerted patients in the held-out test set. The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.36 on the test set, outperforming a baseline model that used only guideline features. We benchmarked SHAP-space clustering against raw feature-space clustering techniques in this alerted test cohort, finding that SHAP-space K-means showed the largest separation in observed fall incidence. The nine clusters identified were then mapped to clinically interpretable risk profiles. These profiles link model alerts to guideline-consistent prevention domains. However, further external validation studies are needed before clinical deployment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.