ArticleScientific reports2026
PLIBEL and QEC for ergonomic risk assessment in operating room scrub nurses during coronary artery bypass grafting: a pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify and evaluate ergonomic risks among scrub nurses during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the Swedish Ergonomic Hazard Identification Method (PLIBEL) and the Quick Exposure Check (QEC). This pilot study was designed to test the feasibility of applying PLIBEL and QEC for ergonomic risk assessment in CABG scrub nurses and to generate preliminary risk profiles. Fifteen scrub nurses from a tertiary hospital in Baoding, China, were enrolled, with each nurse observed during three CABG procedures, resulting in a total of 45 observed operations. The CABG procedure was divided into 11 stages. Two trained observers performed on-site PLIBEL identification and QEC scoring. Video recordings were made during high-load stages, and Kinovea software was used as an auxiliary tool to support observer scoring. QEC scores across stages were compared using the Friedman test. A total of 311 adverse ergonomic factors were identified across the 11 stages. The postoperative finishing stage showed the highest risk, with the "surgical instrument cleaning and disposal" step contributing 36 factors. During intraoperative cooperation, thoracotomy, internal mammary artery harvesting, and vessel anastomosis each had 30-31 adverse factors. QEC scores revealed that static back load reached a high level in the vessel anastomosis cooperation and instrument counting stages, while the neck reached a high load in the vessel anastomosis cooperation, chest closure cooperation, and instrument cleaning stages. Friedman test showed significant stage differences for all body regions (back dynamic P = 0.02, others P < 0.001). The E-value ranged from 38.8% to 61.1%; five stages were high-risk (51%-70%), with the highest in vessel anastomosis cooperation (61.1%). In this small-scale, single-center pilot study, the combination of PLIBEL and QEC appears to be a feasible and useful approach for the preliminary identification of ergonomic risks for CABG scrub nurses. The vessel anastomosis cooperation stage had the highest overall risk, and the neck was the most loaded body region. Targeted interventions, including environmental optimization, workflow restructuring, and ergonomics training, are suggested for high-risk stages, although these recommendations require further evaluation in larger, multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.