Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42722704›Full record

ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2026

FAP

Magdalena Houdova Megova, Chloe Shard, Barbora Vymolova, Nikola Ternerova, Tereza Svablova, Tomas Buna, Daniel Straka, Zdislava Vanickova, Evzen Krepela, Helena Kupcova Skalnikova and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Magdalena Houdova MegovaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-2493
Chloe Shard *Centre for Cancer Biology, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7408-9269
Barbora Vymolova *Laboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nikola TernerovaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tereza SvablovaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas BunaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0878-4882
Daniel StrakaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zdislava VanickovaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Evzen KrepelaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Helena Kupcova SkalnikovaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal KolarLaboratory of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4593-1525
Jana SachovaLaboratory of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan KubovciakLaboratory of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6446-9797
Eva BalaziovaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr VymolaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr HrabalDepartment of Pathology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lisa M EbertCentre for Cancer Biology, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8041-9666
Ashwini PatilCombinatics, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3353-1970
Robert TomasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Motol and Homolka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
David NetukaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Guillermo A GomezCentre for Cancer Biology, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. guillermo.gomez@adelaide.edu.au.
Petr BusekLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. petr.busek2@lf1.cuni.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-4837
Aleksi SedoLaboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3247-5436

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Ideas grant 2021/GNT2013180Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Ideas grant 2023/GNT2030541Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports) 'Center for Tumor ecology' (reg. n. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000785)Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports) EATRIS-CZ (LM2023053)Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports) EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5102Neurosurgical Research Foundation (NRF) Chris Adams awardUniverzita Karlova v Praze (Charles University) 365022Univerzita Karlova v Praze (Charles University) Cooperatio Program, research area 'Oncology and Haematology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor characterized by profound immunosuppression that facilitates tumor progression and promotes therapeutic resistance. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a recognized theranostic target in multiple cancers, is upregulated in GBM and predominantly expressed by pericyte-like stromal cells. Here we identify a role for FAP⁺ pericyte-like cells in shaping the GBM immune microenvironment through monocyte recruitment and differentiation. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets, supported by reverse-transcription quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry, revealed that elevated FAP expression-serving as a proxy for the abundance of FAP⁺ pericyte-like cells-is associated with an immune-enriched tumor microenvironment characterized by higher macrophage abundance and elevated expression of M2 polarization markers. Spatial analyses, including immunofluorescence and spatial transcriptomics, demonstrated that immunosuppressive macrophages preferentially localize in proximity to FAP⁺ pericytes. Single-cell RNA sequencing identified these FAP⁺ cells as a distinct perivascular stromal subset with a unique expression pattern of extracellular matrix components and cytokines, including CCL2 and CSF1, with corresponding receptors expressed on myeloid cells. Functional assays using patient-derived FAP⁺ pericyte-like cells confirmed their ability to attract monocytes via soluble mediators and to promote their differentiation and polarization into tumor-associated macrophages with immunoregulatory features, partly mediated by the CSF1-CSF1R axis. Orthotopic co-implantation experiments in mice further supported their capacity to enhance myeloid infiltration in vivo. Consistent with these biological effects, a transcriptional signature characteristic of FAP⁺ pericytes correlated with worse overall survival in patients with GBM. Together, these findings position FAP⁺ pericyte-like cells as modulators of the GBM immune landscape, fostering a tumor-permissive niche by promoting the differentiation of circulating monocytes into immunoregulatory macrophages. Targeting this stromal population may offer new therapeutic avenues to reprogram tumor-associated immune responses in GBM.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationGelatinasesGlioblastomaMacrophagesMembrane ProteinsMonocytesPericytesSerine EndopeptidasesTumor-Associated MacrophagesAnimalsCell Line, TumorEndopeptidasesFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaHumansMiceEndopeptidasesFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaGelatinasesMembrane ProteinsSerine Endopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID42722704
PMCPMC13633274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.