ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2026
FAP
Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor characterized by profound immunosuppression that facilitates tumor progression and promotes therapeutic resistance. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a recognized theranostic target in multiple cancers, is upregulated in GBM and predominantly expressed by pericyte-like stromal cells. Here we identify a role for FAP⁺ pericyte-like cells in shaping the GBM immune microenvironment through monocyte recruitment and differentiation. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets, supported by reverse-transcription quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry, revealed that elevated FAP expression-serving as a proxy for the abundance of FAP⁺ pericyte-like cells-is associated with an immune-enriched tumor microenvironment characterized by higher macrophage abundance and elevated expression of M2 polarization markers. Spatial analyses, including immunofluorescence and spatial transcriptomics, demonstrated that immunosuppressive macrophages preferentially localize in proximity to FAP⁺ pericytes. Single-cell RNA sequencing identified these FAP⁺ cells as a distinct perivascular stromal subset with a unique expression pattern of extracellular matrix components and cytokines, including CCL2 and CSF1, with corresponding receptors expressed on myeloid cells. Functional assays using patient-derived FAP⁺ pericyte-like cells confirmed their ability to attract monocytes via soluble mediators and to promote their differentiation and polarization into tumor-associated macrophages with immunoregulatory features, partly mediated by the CSF1-CSF1R axis. Orthotopic co-implantation experiments in mice further supported their capacity to enhance myeloid infiltration in vivo. Consistent with these biological effects, a transcriptional signature characteristic of FAP⁺ pericytes correlated with worse overall survival in patients with GBM. Together, these findings position FAP⁺ pericyte-like cells as modulators of the GBM immune landscape, fostering a tumor-permissive niche by promoting the differentiation of circulating monocytes into immunoregulatory macrophages. Targeting this stromal population may offer new therapeutic avenues to reprogram tumor-associated immune responses in GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.