ArticleNature communications2026
Slow growth as a strategy for plant longevity.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ecological theories predict a fundamental trade-off between fast growth and the probability of achieving longevity, with far-reaching consequences for ecosystem resilience and carbon residence time. Tree-ring studies have revealed a globally consistent negative relationship between growth rate and lifespan, yet comparable large-scale evidence for such trade-offs beyond trees remains scarce, largely due to methodological limitations. Here, we exploit annual growth rings formed by secondary thickening in perennial herbaceous plants to test whether the growth-longevity trade-off represents a widespread axis of plant strategies extending across life forms. Using an extensive dataset of over 3100 herbaceous and small woody species, including lianas, sampled across five continents and ecosystems ranging from the Arctic to hot semideserts, we reveal a robust association between slow growth and longevity across life forms and environmental conditions. Moreover, the growth rate exhibited a strong temperature dependence, giving rise to an apparent longevity-temperature relationship, highlighting ecological relevance of growth-longevity coupling. Together, our findings identify the growth-longevity trade-off as a widespread constraint on plant strategies, with important implications for predicting vegetation dynamics, ecosystem stability, and the persistence of terrestrial carbon storage in a changing climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.