ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026
A chip-level MEMS short-period seismometer for distributed planetary seismic networks.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise measurement of seismic activity is fundamental to planetary seismology. However, existing planetary microelectromechanical system (MEMS) seismometers encounter a critical bottleneck in balancing compact chip footprint, a low noise floor, and a wide measurement range. This paper presents a miniaturized MEMS seismometer, which has a compact chip footprint of only 5.2 mm × 6.5 mm. The device utilizes corrugated-gap capacitive sensing comb fingers, which significantly reduce sensing nonlinearity while maintaining high displacement sensitivity, effectively extending the linear measurement range and elevating the pull-in acceleration threshold. Furthermore, the system's effective resonant frequency is reduced by exploiting the electrostatic negative stiffness mechanism, which aims to suppress the seismometer's noise floor. Experimental results validate the seismometer's comprehensive performance, demonstrating a noise floor of 5.5 ng/Hz
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.