ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi2026
Development of an Integrated 6-Year Preventive Medicine Curriculum for Medical Students in Korea: An Expert-informed Deliberative Curriculum Development Study.
Article in Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In Korea, preventive medicine education has remained fragmented across the undergraduate curriculum, with limited longitudinal continuity and increasing pressure to incorporate population health, healthcare systems, community practice, planetary health, and digital health. This study aimed to develop an integrated 6-year preventive medicine curriculum for medical students that would support health promotion, disease prevention, and social accountability at the individual and population levels. We conducted an expert-informed deliberative curriculum development study framed by Walker's deliberative (naturalistic) model and supplemented by Kern's 6-step approach. The development process comprised a literature review and planning activities, 2 curriculum development workshops, 2 structured group deliberation sessions with preventive medicine faculty leaders, small-group meetings, a confirmation workshop, and signature course development meetings. Development records and curriculum artifacts generated through this process were subjected to descriptive synthesis. The final curriculum specified 1 educational purpose, 4 educational objectives, 7 competencies, 5 curricular domains, 3 learning levels, 102 instructional hours, Foundational and Applied course labels, 6 signature courses, and instructional guidebooks. It arranges healthcare systems, determinants of health and disease, planetary health, community-based preventive medicine practice, and integrative analysis of complex health issues along a progression from foundational concepts to advanced integrative application. Expert deliberation refined course terminology, clarified learning progression and course placement, and identified issues relevant to anticipated implementation feasibility. The proposed curriculum positions preventive medicine as a longitudinal, spiral, competency-linked component of undergraduate medical education. As a national reference framework, it is intended to help future physicians connect evidence, systems, communities, and emerging public health challenges with proactive health promotion and disease prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.