ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
Application of the Quadratus Lumborum Block in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective pain control is critical in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery to support recovery and improve postoperative outcomes. Regional anesthetic techniques have gained increasing interest, with the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) emerging as a promising option. As its use expands, this scoping review aimed to map the available evidence on QLB in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery. Specifically, it examined its application, gastrointestinal procedures involved, reported outcomes, and potential advantages and disadvantages.
methodsThis scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and a published protocol with four predefined research questions. The PCC framework was used to define the review scope: Population, pediatric patients; Concept, QLB; Context, gastrointestinal surgery. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies investigating QLB in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery were included. Two reviewers independently conducted screening and data extraction.
resultsTwenty-nine studies were included. QLB was predominantly performed using the posterior approach (55%). The administered anesthetic dose varied from 0.3 to 1 mL/kg. No studies measured the plasma concentrations of local anesthetics or assessed dermatomal coverage. The block was applied across various gastrointestinal procedures, most frequently inguinal hernia repair (76%). Outcomes from different abdominal surgeries were often reported in aggregate (59%). Postoperative pain was the primary outcome, evaluated using six different measures, with variability in pain scales, analgesic protocols, and rescue analgesia thresholds. Pain scores were the most common measure, assessed most often using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (76%). Few studies compared different QLB approaches (10%). QLB offered superior or comparable analgesia compared to other techniques.
conclusionQLB appears effective for pediatric gastrointestinal surgery. However, the literature reveals considerable heterogeneity in outcome measures and study designs. Knowledge gaps remain regarding dose-related safety, dermatomal coverage, optimal dosing, and comparative efficacy of QLB approaches and gastrointestinal procedure-specific effectiveness. These findings may guide future research to optimize QLB use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.