Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721898›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2026

Impact of Wolbachia-mediated incompatible and sterile insect techniques on dengue incidence: a large-scale cluster randomised controlled trial.

Chia-Chen Chang, Jue Tao Lim, Chee Seng Chong, Diyar Mailepessov, Borame Dickens, Yichen Zhai, Lu Deng, Caleb Lee, Li Yun Tan, Grace Chain and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05505682 (Assessing the Efficacy of Male Wolbachia-infected Mosquito Deployments to Reduce Dengue Incidence in Singapore), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05505682 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing the Efficacy of Male Wolbachia-infected Mosquito Deployments to Reduce Dengue Incidence in Singapore: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Environment Agency, SingaporeRan2022 to 2024Enrolled724,428ConditionsDengueArmsBiological (Male Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Chia-Chen ChangEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore; Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jue Tao LimLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Chee Seng ChongEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore. Electronic address: CHONG_Chee_Seng@nea.gov.sg.
Diyar MailepessovEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Borame DickensSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Yichen ZhaiLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Lu DengEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Caleb LeeEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Li Yun TanEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Grace ChainEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Muhammad Faizal ZulkifliEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Jonathan Wee Kent LiewEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Kathryn VasquezEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Man Ling ChauEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Youming NgEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore; Communicable Diseases Agency, Singapore.
Vernon LeeSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore; Communicable Diseases Agency, Singapore.
Shuzhen SimEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Cheong Huat TanEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Lee Ching NgEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore; School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWild-type female Aedes aegypti which mate with Wolbachia-infected male Aedes aegypti (Wolbachia-Aedes) produce non-viable eggs due to cytoplasmic incompatibility. Sustained releases of Wolbachia-infected male Aedes aegypti can suppress wild-type mosquito populations, but robust evidence of its efficacy in reducing dengue incidence is needed.

methodsWe conducted a large-scale cluster-randomised controlled trial involving releases of male wAlbB-infected Ae. aegypti mosquitoes (wAlbB-SG) for dengue control in Singapore. Mosquitoes were irradiated to sterilise potential residual females. Fifteen clusters were randomised: 8 clusters received deployments of male wAlbB-SG infected Ae. aegypti (intervention clusters, n = 393,236) and 7 clusters received no deployments (control clusters, n = 331,192). All clusters practised baseline vector control measures. We assessed the protective efficacy of Wolbachia-Aedes to reduce dengue incidence using a differences-in-differences framework. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05505682) on 2022-08-18.

findingsIn the pre-intervention period, dengue incidence per 100,000 was similar across control (18.63) and intervention (18.14) arms. During the intervention period, reported dengue incidence was 11.31 and 36.57 cases per 100,000 residents in intervention and control arms, respectively. Six months after releases began, intervention clusters showed reductions in total dengue incidence, ranging from 27.6% (95% CI: -35.4% to 61.3%) to 83.8% (95% CI: 50.4%-94.7%). This protective effect varied across time, with some attenuation observed during the 2023 inter-epidemic period. We estimated that 2351 cases (95% CI: 1968-2735) were averted over the period of the trial, relative to 1037 dengue cases reported in the intervention arm. Reductions in epidemiologically-linked dengue incidence were greater, ranging from 60.9% (95% CI: 21.3%-80.6%) to 99.8% (95% CI: 99.2%-99.9%).

interpretationOur results demonstrate the high efficacy of Wolbachia-Aedes in reducing dengue incidence.

fundingMinistry of Finance, Singapore.

Indexed as

Aedes aegyptiDengue controlIIT-SITRCTWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID42721898
PMCPMC13586744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.