ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy2026
Ankle pump exercises do not produce clinically meaningful benefits in oedema, pain, functionality or mobility after acute ankle sprain: a randomised controlled trial.
Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInadequate resolution of inflammation following ankle sprain may contribute to persistent pain and chronic instability. However, the effectiveness of active interventions, such as ankle pump exercises, during the acute phase remains uncertain.
objectiveTo investigate whether ankle pump exercises provide additional benefit when added to usual care in the management of acute ankle sprain.
methodsThis randomised controlled trial included 88 individuals with acute ankle sprain. Both groups received usual care based on the protection, optimal load, ice, compression, and elevation protocol. Participants in the experimental group additionally performed ankle pump exercises. Primary outcomes were oedema, assessed using the figure-of-eight ankle perimetry method; pain, assessed using a visual analog scale; and function, assessed using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (daily living and sports subscales). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 5 days post-intervention, and 15 days post-intervention.
resultsAfter 5 days of intervention, the experimental group demonstrated a greater reduction in ankle oedema than the control group (mean difference -1.2 cm, 95% CI -2.2; -0.2). This between-group difference was not evident at 15-day follow-up (mean difference -0.9 cm, 95% CI -1.9; 0.1). No between-group differences were observed for pain, ankle range of motion, or function at any time point.
conclusionOur findings indicate that adding ankle pump exercises to usual care produced a statistically significant but small short-term reduction in oedema compared to usual care alone, unlikely to be clinically meaningful. No benefits were observed in pain, mobility, or function, and no between-group differences were observed at the 15-day follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.