ReviewClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Intraoperative mechanical ventilation management in COPD: A state of the art review.
Review in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a prevalent condition in surgical patients and is recognized as a significant risk factor for negative postoperative outcomes. Such adverse outcomes include increased admissions to intensive care units, extended hospitalizations, prolonged ventilation, and elevated rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Intraoperative mechanical ventilation is a crucial strategy for managing COPD and improving postoperative outcomes in this high-risk population. However, typical ventilation measures employed during general anesthesia may exacerbate COPD-related physiological dysfunctions if not appropriately optimized. Patients with COPD are particularly susceptible to expiratory flow limitation, dynamic hyperinflation, Intrinsic Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEPi), and Ventilation-Perfusion (V/Q) mismatch during positive-pressure ventilation. Controlled tidal volumes, longer expiratory duration, appropriate external PEEP, and cautious ventilation mode selection are needed to address these pathophysiological concerns. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on preoperative assessments relevant to ventilation in patients with COPD, examines intraoperative ventilation strategies, and highlights the underlying physiological principles and clinical implications of various approaches used during surgery. Overall, the available evidence supports adopting a personalized, patient-guided approach to intraoperative ventilation rather than uniform ventilatory targets. Although COPD is a notable risk factor for respiratory and non-respiratory complications in the perioperative context, there is a lack of studies specifically addressing intraoperative ventilation management in COPD. Therefore, there is a pressing need for future research to inform decision-making for personalized intraoperative ventilation strategies and to improve clinical outcomes and prognosis in this most vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.