ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Ethics of Care in Nursing: Protocol for a Qualitative Systematic Review and Best-Fit Framework Synthesis.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEthics of care lies at the heart of the nursing profession. Grounded in the work of Gilligan and Tronto, it emphasizes relationships and responsiveness to the needs of those receiving care. Although Tronto's framework specifies 5 elements of care, no systematic synthesis has yet examined how each element is expressed through observable behavioral indicators in the nursing context.
objectiveThis review aims to identify, appraise, and synthesize the components and indicators of the ethics of care in the nursing profession, drawing on the frameworks of Gilligan and Tronto. It addresses 4 research questions concerning the components of the ethics of care, the indicators or behaviors that reflect each component, any indicators or aspects not yet captured by the existing frameworks, and how the components and indicators vary across contexts.
methodsThis qualitative systematic review will use best-fit framework synthesis. Five electronic databases (CINAHL Complete, PubMed or MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and JSTOR) were searched, supplemented by backward citation searching of the reference lists of included studies, without date restriction and limited to English-language publications. The methodological quality of included studies will be appraised using the JBI tools to inform interpretation rather than as an exclusion criterion, and data will be synthesized in NVivo. The review will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 and PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension) guidelines.
resultsThis study received no external funding. The searches across the 5 databases were conducted in May 2026 and yielded 30,134 records; after the removal of 4855 duplicates, 25,279 records remained for screening. At the time of submission of this revised manuscript (May 2026), screening and data extraction were underway, and the review was anticipated to be completed by December 2026, with results expected to be published in 2027.
conclusionsThe synthesized definitions and indicators will provide a foundation for developing assessment instruments and practice guidelines for the ethics of care in the nursing profession, as well as for advancing nursing education.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD420251032024; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251032024. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/85172.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.