ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Machine learning-based prediction of cross-immunity.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cross-immunity, defined as the ability of T-cells to recognize multiple antigen peptide-major histocompatibility complexes, is a fundamental feature of adaptive immunity. However, the prediction of different peptide epitopes that can be recognized by the same T-cell receptor remains challenging. Currently, artificial intelligent (AI)-based machine learning (ML) methods can be successfully used for pattern recognition in epitope molecular space by detecting the functional similarity between peptide sequences. In this study, using literature-based experimental data, we examined ML-based binary classification models trained on small datasets to predict the activity of nine-amino-acid-long peptides. Our results suggest that the consensus function of well-established similarity matrix-based representations and structural-based descriptors of epitopes yields better performance because representation-specific noises are reduced and individual model weaknesses are partially compensated. We also sought to determine the extent to which the predictive power of the applied AIs procedure depended on the physicochemical content of the descriptor set during the training process. In addition, challenging the models, we applied them to an independent experimental dataset to examine the effects of diverse laboratory conditions on a regulated biological measurement. In summary, applying a consensus function can capture the biological complexity of cross-reactivity at the binary classification level, even when applied to relatively small datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.