Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721438›Full record

ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2026

Trauma levels and coping strategies of health sciences students following the large-scale earthquakes in Türkiye.

Gözde Yıldız Daş Geçim, Kübra Okuyucu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gözde Yıldız Daş GeçimAmasya University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Public Health Nursing, Amasya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-2016
Kübra OkuyucuAmasya University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Amasya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9712-7726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the trauma levels and associated coping strategies with earthquake stress experienced by health sciences students after the large-scale earthquakes that occurred in Türkiye in 2023.

methodThis cross-sectional study was carried out using online surveys in April-July 2023 with 398 students living in Türkiye and studying the faculty of health sciences. Data were collected with a Participant Information Form, Post-Earthquake Trauma Level Determination Scale (PETLDS) and the Coping with Earthquake Stress Scale (CESS).

resultsThe students' average PETLDS score was determined as 54.6 ± 16.81 (range: 20-100) indicating that the students were traumatised. The post-earthquake trauma levels were associated with the level of positive reappraisal coping (r = 0.186, p < 0.001). Compared to students from other departments, nursing students showed higher scores on the CESS subscales of religious coping (r = 0.110, p = 0.028), positive reappraisal (r = 0.224, p < 0.001), and seeking for social support (r = 0.137, p = 0.006), while reporting lower levels of trauma.

conclusionStudents exhibited high post-earthquake trauma levels, which were associated with several demographic and exposure-related factors. Compared with students from other health sciences departments, nursing students had lower trauma levels. They also reported higher use of positive reappraisal, religious coping, and seeking social support strategies.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCoping SkillsEarthquakesStress, PsychologicalStudents, Health OccupationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42721438
PMCPMC13561536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.