Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721333›Full record

ArticlePsychological assessment2026

Computerized adaptive testing of neurocognitive deficits in psychosis.

Michael L Thomas, Emily T Sturm, Maiele Mignard, Anastasia G Sares, John R Duffy, Jazmin M Diaz, Don Rojas, Kristina T Legget, Jason R Tregellas, Jared W Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael L ThomasDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University.ORCID 0000-0002-3026-7609
Emily T SturmDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University.
Maiele MignardDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University.
Anastasia G SaresDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University.
John R DuffyDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University.
Jazmin M DiazDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University.
Don RojasDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University.
Kristina T LeggetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.
Jason R TregellasDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.
Jared W YoungDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego.

Funding

An Adaptive Testing Platform for Optimizing RDoC Experimental Cognitive MeasuresR01MH121546 · NIMH · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THOMAS, MICHAEL L · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental HealthNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is a technology that has been used to improve the precision and efficiency of individual difference estimates for cognitive, achievement, personality, and clinical symptom assessments. Motivated by the psychometric limitations of experimental cognitive tasks, we determined whether experimental cognitive tasks, such as those being developed for the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria initiative and similar projects, could also benefit from CAT. Participants were 64 patients diagnosed with psychosis spectrum disorders and 50 healthy controls who completed at least one of six experimental cognitive tasks: a probabilistic learning task (PLT), a continuous performance task (CPT), a flanker task, a Sternberg task, a self-ordered pointing task (SOPT), and an N-back task. Results indicated strong correlations between ability estimates for fixed and CAT versions of most tasks, except the PLT. CAT significantly reduced standard error for the CPT, Sternberg, and SOPT, but not for the N-back, flanker, or PLT. The tasks benefiting most from CAT were those with more fine-grained levels of difficulty. These findings suggest that adaptive testing can improve the psychometric properties of experimental cognitive tasks relevant to the Research Domain Criteria framework. This improvement depends on the granularity of conditions and difficulty levels, however, highlighting an important consideration for integrating CAT into cognitive psychopathology research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiers

PMID42721333
PMCPMC13565237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.