Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721302›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2026

Profiling Human-AI Regulatory Support in Technology-Enhanced Interprofessional Education Among Health Professions Students: Person-Centered Exploratory Study.

Fraide A Ganotice, John Ian Wilzon T Dizon, Xiaoai Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fraide A GanoticeBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F William MW Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, HKG, China (Hong Kong), 852 3917 9814.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-9926
John Ian Wilzon T DizonBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F William MW Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, HKG, China (Hong Kong), 852 3917 9814.ORCID 0000-0002-4912-7390
Xiaoai ShenBau Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Education, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F William MW Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, HKG, China (Hong Kong), 852 3917 9814.ORCID 0000-0001-8307-7959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Technology-enhanced health care interprofessional education (IPE) places high demands on students' self-regulated learning (SRL) and their ability to work productively with others to prepare them for collaborative practice in health care settings. Yet, little is known about how health professions students perceive and combine their own SRL with coregulation from human and AI-based support in such environments. Objective: This exploratory and observational study adopted a person-centered approach to identify regulatory profiles based on self-reported SRL and perceived coregulation with near-peer teachers (NPTs) and generative AI (GenAI), and to examine how these profiles were associated with interprofessional learning outcomes. Methods: Health professions students (N=136) enrolled in a technology-enhanced IPE completed an SRL questionnaire at the beginning of the program. They rated coregulation from NPTs at midprogram and coregulation from GenAI at the end, together with communication, collaboration, and learning satisfaction. A 2-stage exploratory clustering approach using SRL and coregulation scores as indicators was used to identify distinct regulatory profiles. Profile differences in interprofessional communication, collaboration, and learning satisfaction were examined using independent samples 2-tailed Results: A 2-profile solution provided the best fit to the data. The positive human-NPT-GenAI regulation profile (51/136, 37.5%) was characterized by moderately high SRL, high coregulation with NPTs, and above-average coregulation with GenAI. The negative human-NPT-GenAI regulation profile (85/136, 62.5%) showed the opposite pattern, with moderately low SRL, low coregulation with NPTs, and below-average coregulation with GenAI. Students in the positive profile reported significantly higher interprofessional communication ( Conclusions: These findings provide person-centered evidence that self-regulation and coregulation from human and AI agents form distinct perceived regulatory configurations in technology-enhanced IPE and that a richer "regulatory ecology," combining stronger SRL with greater perceived coregulation from near-peer and GenAI support, was associated with more favorable interprofessional outcomes. The study highlights the importance of deliberately designing near-peer teaching and GenAI-supported activities as complementary regulatory scaffolds in health professions education.

Indexed as

Health OccupationsInterprofessional EducationStudents, Health OccupationsAdultFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleSurveys and Questionnairescluster analysiscoregulationgenerative AIhealth professionsinterprofessional educationself‑regulated learning

Identifiers

PMID42721302
PMCPMC13561188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.