ArticleJMIR cardio2026
Feasibility of Mobile Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR cardio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major contributor of thromboembolic stroke. However, early detection remains challenging and is severely hindered by structural limitations in health care infrastructure. While current clinical guidelines recognize a 30-second single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) as a standard diagnostic tool, the actual deployment and real-world utility of mobile screening technologies across health care settings remain poorly understood. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world feasibility of a mobile single-lead ECG for the detection of AF in routine inpatient and outpatient settings. Feasibility was evaluated by the proportion of successfully completed recordings, patient acceptance, and the occurrence and characteristics of technical challenges during deployment. Methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional pragmatic implementation study enrolled patients across 3 university hospitals and 3 primary care practices. Screening was performed using an US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved single-lead ECG device (AliveCor KardiaMobile). Patients with an automated device reading indicating "Possible AF" and no prior diagnosis of AF underwent a confirmatory 12-lead ECG. Patient awareness and acceptance were evaluated using an exploratory, descriptive questionnaire. Results: A total of 237 patients were enrolled (194 inpatients and 43 outpatients). The device algorithm provided an automatic interpretation in 95.3% (41/43) of the outpatients and 85.6% (166/194) of inpatients, resulting in an overall automated detection of AF in 21.5% (51/237) of the cohort. The algorithm identified newly suspected AF in 1.7% (4/237) of patients without a prior AF diagnosis. Of these, 1 case underwent same-day confirmatory 12-lead ECG and was confirmed as AF. Technical challenges occurred in 16.0% (38/237) of all recordings, with a numerical higher rate observed in the inpatient setting (34/194, 17.5% vs 4/43, 9.3% in outpatients; Conclusions: Mobile single-lead ECG screening is feasible in routine inpatient and outpatient settings and identified a substantial prevalence of AF, which increased with age. The high detection rate underscores the potential of wearable ECG devices to facilitate early detection of AF. However, the absence of systematic confirmatory ECG testing and limited patient engagement with telemedicine applications highlight challenges in real-world implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.