Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721219›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2026

African swine fever virus impairs porcine alveolar macrophages bactericidal function by disrupting lysosomal acidification and cathepsin activity.

Zhen Xu, Fengyang Shi, Zhiyong Xiang, Runzhi Guo, Zhenyu Wen, Yajin Qu, Quanlin Li, Qiongqiong Zhou, Peng Gao, Yongning Zhang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zhen XuState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Fengyang ShiState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Zhiyong XiangState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Runzhi GuoState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Zhenyu WenState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Yajin QuState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Quanlin LiState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Qiongqiong ZhouState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Peng GaoState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Yongning ZhangState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Xinna GeState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Jun HanState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Xin GuoState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Lei ZhouState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8837-3965
Hanchun YangState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3359-3925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a devastating pathogen that poses a severe threat to the global swine industry. ASFV primarily targets the porcine monocyte-macrophage system, which is crucial for defending against bacterial infections via phagocytosis and subsequent intracellular degradation. Clinically, ASFV infection can be complicated by severe secondary bacterial infections. This creates a compelling paradox: while prior in vitro studies indicate that ASFV actually increases the phagocytic activity of porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs), clinical observations frequently report severe secondary bacterial infections. This contradiction led us to hypothesize that the downstream intracellular bactericidal clearance might be compromised. Here, utilizing an in vitro co-infection model, it was demonstrated that ASFV significantly impairs the bactericidal capacity of PAMs against representative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Glaesserella parasuis, and Streptococcus suis), facilitating their intracellular survival and persistence. Although ASFV infection triggers massive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, this oxidative stress remains functionally ineffective because phagolysosomal acidification and structural integrity are profoundly impaired. Mechanistically, at the late stage of infection, ASFV launches a multipronged assault on the endolysosomal network. Structurally, ASFV inhibits phagosomal and lysosomal acidification while inducing oxidative stress-driven severe lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP), leading to reduced phagolysosome volume and physical depletion of the lysosomal pool. Molecularly, ASFV impairs degradative capacity through the transcriptional suppression and blunted lysosomal enrichment of vacuolar (H+) ATPase (V-ATPase) subunits, alongside the disruption of lysosomal protease cathepsin D (CTSD) maturation. Furthermore, systematic screening identified six core candidate viral proteins, including CP530R, D129R, E183L, O174L, Q706L, and QP509R, that profoundly suppress both ATP6V0D and CTSK transcription, further exacerbating this functional impairment. Collectively, our in vitro findings reveal that ASFV dismantles host phagolysosomal acidification, thereby neutralizing the microbicidal potential of infected macrophages and potentially converting them into a permissive niche for secondary bacterial pathogens. These observations provide critical new mechanistic insights that may help explain ASFV-associated immune dysfunction at the cellular level.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusCathepsinsLysosomesMacrophages, AlveolarAnimalsPhagocytosisPhagosomesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSwineCathepsinsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID42721219
PMCPMC13588506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.