Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721207›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

A real-time forecasting framework for emerging infectious diseases affecting animal populations.

Meryl Theng, Simin Lee, Andrew C Breed, Sharon Roche, Emily Sellens, Catherine Fraser, Kelly Wood, Chris P Jewell, Mark A Stevenson, Chris Baker and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meryl ThengSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1016-1487
Simin LeeMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2631-9899
Andrew C BreedEpidemiology, Surveillance and Laboratory Section, Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3439-9510
Sharon RocheEpidemiology, Surveillance and Laboratory Section, Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Emily SellensEpidemiology, Surveillance and Laboratory Section, Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9360-1419
Catherine FraserBiosecurity & Food Safety, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.
Kelly WoodBiosecurity & Food Safety, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.
Chris P JewellDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-2178
Mark A StevensonMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris BakerSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Simon M FirestoneMelbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3239-1419

Funding

Australian Government Department of AgricultureAustralian Research CouncilAustralian Research Data Commons (ARDC)University of Melbourne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious disease forecasting has become increasingly important in public health. However, forecasting tools for emergency animal diseases, particularly those offering real-time decision support when parameters governing disease dynamics are unknown, remain limited. We introduce a generalised modelling framework for near-real-time forecasting of the temporal and spatial spread of infectious livestock diseases using data from the early stages of an outbreak. We applied the framework to the 2007 equine influenza outbreak in Australia, generating forecasts at three timepoints across four regional clusters. Prediction targets included future daily case counts, outbreak size, peak timing and duration, and spatial distributions of future spread. We evaluated how well the forecasts predicted daily cases and the spatial distribution of case counts, using skill scores (a measure of probabilistic forecast accuracy) as a benchmark for future model improvements. Forecast accuracy, certainty, and skill improved after formation of the outbreak's peak, while early forecasts were more uncertain or prone to overestimation, highlighting the need for caution when interpreting pre-peak predictions, particularly when the impacts of control policies on future transmission are not adequately represented in the model. Spatial forecasts of broad, relative risk patterns were more robust than precise predictions of risk at the individual premises level or exact daily cases counts, supporting geographically targeted response strategies. Overall, this framework supports real-time decision-making in livestock disease outbreaks when applied with appropriate consideration of uncertainty, and establishes a foundation for future refinements and applications to other animal diseases.

Indexed as

Communicable Diseases, EmergingAnimalsAustraliaComputational BiologyDisease OutbreaksEpidemiological ModelsForecastingHorse DiseasesHorsesModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsPrediction Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID42721207
PMCPMC13561369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.