ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
A real-time forecasting framework for emerging infectious diseases affecting animal populations.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infectious disease forecasting has become increasingly important in public health. However, forecasting tools for emergency animal diseases, particularly those offering real-time decision support when parameters governing disease dynamics are unknown, remain limited. We introduce a generalised modelling framework for near-real-time forecasting of the temporal and spatial spread of infectious livestock diseases using data from the early stages of an outbreak. We applied the framework to the 2007 equine influenza outbreak in Australia, generating forecasts at three timepoints across four regional clusters. Prediction targets included future daily case counts, outbreak size, peak timing and duration, and spatial distributions of future spread. We evaluated how well the forecasts predicted daily cases and the spatial distribution of case counts, using skill scores (a measure of probabilistic forecast accuracy) as a benchmark for future model improvements. Forecast accuracy, certainty, and skill improved after formation of the outbreak's peak, while early forecasts were more uncertain or prone to overestimation, highlighting the need for caution when interpreting pre-peak predictions, particularly when the impacts of control policies on future transmission are not adequately represented in the model. Spatial forecasts of broad, relative risk patterns were more robust than precise predictions of risk at the individual premises level or exact daily cases counts, supporting geographically targeted response strategies. Overall, this framework supports real-time decision-making in livestock disease outbreaks when applied with appropriate consideration of uncertainty, and establishes a foundation for future refinements and applications to other animal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.