ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Biomarker discovery and patient stratification in pancreatic cancer using incomplete multi-omics data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a 12% 5-year survival rate, is the most aggressive type of cancer. Early diagnosis for this pathology is rare, and conventional treatments such as surgery, radio- or chemotherapy, have little to no effect on reducing mortality. Machine learning (ML) approaches could be used to identify biomarkers that help clinicians stratify patients and improve treatment outcomes. However, most ML techniques perform poorly with incomplete data, which is usually the case in real-world settings, often forcing researchers to discard valuable information. In this study, unsupervised ML algorithms capable of dealing with missing modalities were applied to incomplete multi-omics data from PDAC patients to identify clinically meaningful patient subgroups. Through a large-scale clustering benchmark including six omics layers, we discovered two novel subgroups with statistically significant differences in survival and recurrence after surgery, particularly within the first two years, when most patient deaths occur, as well as distinct tumor mutational burden. Comprehensive multi-omics analyses revealed substantial molecular differences between patients in both groups, identified three methylation biomarkers to stratify patients, and highlighted dysregulation in key oncogenic pathways. Importantly, the identified groups are different from previous PDAC classifications, both in their patient composition, prognosis, and in the oncogenic gene pathway profiles exhibited. Using an independent cohort, we further demonstrated that both the prognostic value of these subtypes and their underlying biological characteristics are reproducible. These results could lead to better stratified treatment regimens to improve the prognosis of PDAC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.