Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721199›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Intensive longitudinal assessment of stress and stress-related concepts across a weight loss program: Protocol for a longitudinal ecological momentary assessment study.

Chelsea L Kracht, Ann M Davis, Udayan Apte, Madigan Snodgrass, Taylor Y Collier, Jeffery J Honas, John M Jakicic

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06668259 (Intensive Longitudinal Assessment of Stress and Stress-related Concepts Across a Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06668259 active not recruitingnot on this map

Intensive Longitudinal Assessment of Stress and Stress-related Concepts Across a Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention: INSTANT Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled52ConditionsIndividual Stress and Weight Loss
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chelsea L KrachtDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5467-0849
Ann M DavisDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4859-5894
Udayan ApteDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Madigan SnodgrassDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Taylor Y CollierDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
Jeffery J HonasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
John M JakicicDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.

Funding

longitudinal assessment of stress and stress-related concepts across a behavioral weight loss interventionP20GM144269 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI John P Thyfault, STEVEN A WEINMAN · 2022 to 2026
$14.9M
NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD109931NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM144269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluctuations in daily stress and the inability to cope with this stress (i.e., coping) can negatively impact behavior and potentially weight loss. Longitudinal studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of psychological factors and behavior may inform interventions that can be adapted in real-time to modify stress and stress-related factors to enhance weight loss. This study's purpose is to examine variability in stress and stress-related concepts and weight loss during a behavioral weight loss program with the intent of this informing future interventions.

methodsIndividuals with obesity (body mass index: ≥ 30 kg/m2) who are newly enrolled in an existing community-based behavioral weight loss programs will be recruited. Participants will complete four visits, to coincide with before program (week-0), early program (6-weeks), program mid-point (3-months), and program end (6-months). Each visit will include height, weight, and questionnaires related to chronic stress and coping, and weight-related behaviors. Participants will then complete at least 14-days of EMA, including one morning survey, four signal-contingent surveys during fixed 3-hour windows, and one night-time survey daily via a smartphone application. During these 14-days, participants will also complete device-based measures for physical activity and sleep and waking saliva collection to evaluate cortisol. The primary exposure is the difference (i.e., variability) in signal-contingent survey stress, coping, and affect at baseline. The primary outcome is weight change across 6-months. This study received initial startup in March 2024, and was registered in Clinical Trials in October 2024. The study began recruitment in March 2025 and anticipate completion in early 2027. DISCUSSION: Findings may inform justification for the pursuit of an ecological momentary intervention focused on improving stress while engaging in a behavioral weight loss intervention to support behavior change and potentially weight loss.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06668259.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentObesityStress, PsychologicalWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultCoping SkillsFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneLongitudinal StudiesMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesWeight LossHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID42721199
PMCPMC13561333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.