ArticlePloS one2026
Modeling determinants of women's decision-making autonomy on agriculture and household matters in rural Ethiopia: a mixed effects beta regression tree analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite existing research on women's decision-making autonomy (WDMA), there remains a significant gap in understanding the complex factors influencing women's autonomy. This study investigated the determinants of WDMA in agriculture and household matters in rural Ethiopia. The study used data from nine rural districts in the Oromia and the former Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples region in Ethiopia. A mixed effects beta regression tree model was used to identify variables impacting WDMA across diverse participant segments. The analysis incorporated various fixed effects, including family size, women's and their partners' years of education, women's age, women's perception towards cultural norms on gender differences, religion, household wealth quintiles, and participation in social groups. Random effects were taken into account by including the districts of the households and the survey rounds, while the gender of the household leader and marital status served as partitioning variables. Factors that were found to be significantly associated with WDMA among the married women from male-led households were: the age of the women, the perception of women towards cultural norms on gender difference, if women were Muslim compared to Orthodox Christian, richness of households and participation in social groups. In the case of women not in marriage and who were from male-led households, we identified the same factors to be associated with increased WDMA. Among women in female-led segments, only the age of the women and Orthodox Christianity compared to Muslim followers were contributing significantly to a higher WDMA. Interventions aimed at increasing women's decision-making autonomy should consider acting on some of these determinants so that women can play a more prominent role in agricultural and household matters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.