Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721188›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

A feasibility study evaluating seismocardiography for the detection of heart failure.

Ahmad Agam, Emil Korsgaard, Troels Yding Haugstrup, Kasper Janus Grønn Emerek, Maria Weinkouff Pedersen, Massar Omar, Jacob Eifer Møller, Kristian Kragholm, Samuel Emil Schmidt, Peter Søgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ahmad AgamDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6123-9072
Emil KorsgaardDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University AAU, Aalborg, Denmark.
Troels Yding HaugstrupDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0837-3843
Kasper Janus Grønn EmerekDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5194-2044
Maria Weinkouff PedersenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Massar OmarDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jacob Eifer MøllerDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Kristian KragholmDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-8670
Samuel Emil SchmidtDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University AAU, Aalborg, Denmark.
Peter SøgaardDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to develop a seismocardiograph (SCG)- based algorithm and assess its diagnostic performance in the detection of heart failure (HF). A total of 218 subjects were included: 198 with suspected HF and 20 with known HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were included for testing only. Assessments were conducted using SCG, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), electrocardiogram, NYHA classification and echocardiography. SCG-based algorithms, "AnyHF score" were developed to identify all subtypes of HF and "HFrEF-score" to identify HFrEF. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The AnyHF score demonstrated an AUC of 82%, sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 43.8%, NPV of 87.5% and PPV of 52.6% in detecting HF versus no HF. A balanced comparative analysis was performed between NT-proBNP and the HFrEF-score for detecting HFrEF versus no HF. NT-proBNP demonstrated an AUC of 94.7%, sensitivity 94.1%, specificity 68.8%, NPV 99%, and PPV 27.1%. The HFrEF-score showed an AUC of 92.9%, sensitivity 88.2%, specificity 92% (p < 0.001), NPV 98.4%, and PPV 57.7% (p = 0.007). The SCG-scores also categorized 71 patients (51%) from the no HF group, referred on suspicion of HF, as minimal risk of HF. This study suggests that SCG has potential to aid in the diagnostic process of HF. The SCG-based algorithms "AnyHF-score" and "HFrEF-score" demonstrated high diagnostic performance in identifying HF.

Identifiers

PMID42721188
PMCPMC13561325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.